Roelof Moorlag
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 1,468
- Location
- Netherlands
- Lightroom Experience
- Power User
- Lightroom Version
- Classic
I made my workflow as efficient as i could the last years by eliminating all different programs i used and consolidate everything into lightroom. So no more "best-of-breed", an idea that i originally (and still) like.
However, i made to many mistakes by all manual steps, it costed to much time and i get behind with my work.
When Phase One did not pick up the development of Expression Media as i hoped for i made the choice to migrate to Lightroom. To integrate all steps in a way Adobe had devised out did cost me a lot of time but i'm there now.
Now i think i fully understand the ingestion proces. Also did not like the changes Adobe made a few iterations back (and reverted them after all comments).
In my opinion however the ingestion proces can do a lot better. I have looked at Photomechanic and they prove it can.
Previously i thought that people used Photomechanic as an alternative to lightroom and perhaps that is the case but I get the impression that a lot off them use it in combination with each other: ingest and culling with Photomechanic and RAW development and management in Lightroom.
I'm not fond of expanding my workflow again (after al my consolidating). However it's looks like Photomechanic brings some major benefits: much more faster ingestion/culling proces.
What are your experiences with this combo?
Are there any signs Adobe is developing some major imrovements in the ingestion module that would made my consideration obsolete?
However, i made to many mistakes by all manual steps, it costed to much time and i get behind with my work.
When Phase One did not pick up the development of Expression Media as i hoped for i made the choice to migrate to Lightroom. To integrate all steps in a way Adobe had devised out did cost me a lot of time but i'm there now.
Now i think i fully understand the ingestion proces. Also did not like the changes Adobe made a few iterations back (and reverted them after all comments).
In my opinion however the ingestion proces can do a lot better. I have looked at Photomechanic and they prove it can.
Previously i thought that people used Photomechanic as an alternative to lightroom and perhaps that is the case but I get the impression that a lot off them use it in combination with each other: ingest and culling with Photomechanic and RAW development and management in Lightroom.
I'm not fond of expanding my workflow again (after al my consolidating). However it's looks like Photomechanic brings some major benefits: much more faster ingestion/culling proces.
What are your experiences with this combo?
Are there any signs Adobe is developing some major imrovements in the ingestion module that would made my consideration obsolete?